Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Mensik vs Dusan Lajovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mensik vs Lajovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Jakub Mensik vs Dusan Lajovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mensik 1 - 0 Lajovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mensik has won 51.59% of points on their second serve, while Lajovic has won 50.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mensik, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lajovic has won 50.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.4% and 28.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mensik has saved 68.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lajovic has saved 56.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mensik has won 62.07% of matches played (W/L 36/ 22), with Lajovic winning 47.06% (W/L 24/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Lajovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 327/ 226), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 6/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Lajovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 12/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mensik winning 1 times and Lajovic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mensik winning 2 and Lajovic winning 0. The last match between Mensik and Lajovic was at the Davis Cup, Group C, Valencia, 16-09-2023, Rubber 1, I.hard with Jakub Mensik getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mensik and Lajovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mensik winning 0 times and Lajovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mensik winning 0, and Lajovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mensik has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.74 while Lajovic has played against players with an average rank of 160.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mensik has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lajovic has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mensik has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lajovic has converted 42.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
85
Rank
65
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
56
Rank
23
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
64% (97-55)
Career Total W/L
54% (513-434)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
50% (13-13)
$693,650
Career Prize Money
$4,809,855
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jakub Mensik vs Dusan Lajovic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mensik VS Lajovic
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Jakub Mensik | Dusan Lajovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (32/41) | 59% (27/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 94% (30/32) | 74% (20/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (6/9) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (17/46) | 12% (5/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Jakub Mensik
Player
Dusan Lajovic
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Mensik | Dusan Lajovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 50% (13/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (49/32) | 48% (33/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (406/382) | 50% (336/331) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (17/7) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 56% (10/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 293 | 57 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:13 | 1:55:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.56 | 138.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1500/2537) | 70% (1443/2052) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1111/1500) | 67% (973/1443) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (535/1037) | 50% (307/609) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (72/168) | 43% (81/190) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (846/2388) | 37% (761/2063) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 29% (2/5) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 58% (7/5) | 67% (10/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (21/32) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 70% (7/10) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Jakub Mensik
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Fabio Fognini
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
11
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
11
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Christopher Eubanks
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Otte
Player
Jakub Mensik
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
10
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
6
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Jakub Mensik
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
28
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
59%
(
74 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
16
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Dusan Lajovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Dusan Lajovic
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
114
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Roman Safiullin
65%
(
117 of
179)
1st Serve %
63%
(
109 of
172)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
68 of
109)
56%
(
35 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
72 of
179)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
74 of
172)
181
Total Points Won
170
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Dusan Lajovic
78%
(
69 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Dusan Lajovic
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Dusan Lajovic
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
24 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Arthur Fils
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
51 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(10) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ugo Humbert
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mensik Vs Lajovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mensik are available here and Lajovic photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jakub Mensik
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dusan Lajovic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
